Criminal Law Keyed to Johnson
State v. Hunter
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
At the time of this case, § 21-3401 of the Kansas Statutes precluded use of the defense of compulsionin cases where the defendant was charged with first degree murder or voluntary homicide, but did not specifically state whether the defense was permitted in felony murder cases. Hunter (Defendant) hitched a ride in a truck in which Remeta and others were riding. Remeta, after brandishing guns and making threatening comments to Defendant about killing hitchhikers, shot and wounded a policeman who had pulled the truck over. The group then proceeded to a grain elevator, where Remata, apparently assisted by Defendant, took two people as hostages. After the truck had proceeded some distance, Remata shot and killed the hostages. Defendant was charged with two counts of felony murder for his participation in the kidnapping and killing of the hostages. At Defendant’s trial, witnesses for the State testified that Defendant had been armed, but both Defendant and Remata testified that only Remata was armed and that Remata had ordered Defendant to watch the hostages. There was testimony that Defendant had been out of Remata’s sight at the back of the elevator building for a period of about five minutes, but Defendant testified that he did not think he had a chance to escape. The court refused Defendant’s request to instruct the jury on the defense of compulsion on the ground that § 21-3401 precluded the defense in cases of felony murder. Defendant was convicted of felony murder. Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court of Kansas.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.