Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
State v. Wickstrom
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
After getting into an argument over money with his girlfriend, Cynthia Hall, Donald Wickstrom (Defendant) repeatedly hit, kicked, and pulled the hair of Hall and his mother, Gayle Gonsoir. Hall was eight months pregnant with Wickstrom’s child at the time. Several of Wickstrom’s punches and kicks landed on Hall’s abdomen. Despite the pleas of both women to stop, Wickstrom continued his assault on both of them. After being examined at a hospital, Hall subsequently delivered a female child that exhibited no signs of life. Wickstrom was charged with second-degree felony murder, first-degree assault, and criminal abortion. At trial, Wickstrom testified that he had drunk six to eight beers at a bar on the afternoon of the altercation. However, Hall, Gonsoir, and police officers indicated that they saw no signs of intoxication at the time of the incident. Hall and Gonsoir testified that Wickstrom did not intend to abort the baby, only to harm them. Wickstrom was convicted on all counts and he appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.