Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
People v. Jeffers
Facts
Bronico D. Jeffers (Defendant), a convicted felon, entered a gun shop and asked to speak with an employee, Richard Maness. Charles Bodoh, the shop’s owner, informed Defendant that Maness was busy and offered to help Defendant. Defendant handed Bodoh a wrapped box and told him that he was making a delivery for a friend. Bodoh unwrapped the box as Defendant began to leave the shop. Bodoh stopped Defendant and informed him that the box contained a .380 caliber handgun and that he would need Defendant’ name, address, and telephone number in order to enter the gun into the shop’s logbook. After Defendant provided the information he left the shop. Shortly thereafter, it was learned that the gun’s serial numbers had been filed off which was reported by Bodoh to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF). A detective with the sheriff’s department, Richard Beaudreaux, subsequently confiscated the handgun and contacted Defendant. Defendant told Beaudreaux that he had taken the gun to the shop for a friend, Richard Kent Johnson. However, Defendant could not tell Beaudreaux how to locate Johnson and the detective was unable to locate Johnson after a brief search. Defendant was indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of California’s Penal Code § 12021. At trial, Defendant argued that he had no knowledge of what was inside the box when he delivered it to the gun shop. Defendant also requested that the court instruct the jury that § 12021 is not violated automatically when an ex-felon comes into possession of a firearm, without knowledge that he has a firearm, but later learns of the firearm. The court refused to give the instruction and Defendant was convicted. He appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.