Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
State v. Tuttle
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Shortly after arriving at his grandmother’s mobile home, Thomas John Tuttle (Defendant), eighteen-years-old, and his friend got into a heated argument and shoving match. Several nearby neighbors came out to watch and eventually separate the two. During this time, the police was called to respond to the disturbance. Upon their arrival, the officers observed Defendant standing near a parked car. After speaking to several people the officers found nothing unusual and prepared to leave. Then, Defendant’s grandmother approached the officers and asked them to eject some people from within her mobile home. The officers went inside and found the Terrance Yellow Earrings, the boyfriend of Defendant’s mother, standing by the kitchen sink, bleeding from with multiple stab wounds. Three other individuals were in the trailer at the time: Defendant’s mother and his two uncles. Yellow Earrings was transported to a hospital and the police took Defendant and the three individuals inside the mobile home to the station for questioning. Detective Thaddeus Openhowski interrogated Defendant. During the questioning, Openhowski told Defendant that his report could be written to make things look good for Defendant or that “I’m gonna have to write it up that you’re not cooperating, you’re being a real jerk about it.” Defendant responded by saying, “Ok. I stabbed him. Whatever…” Defendant was charged with aggravated assault. At trial, Yellow Earrings was the only eyewitness who testified against Defendant. Defendant was convicted and he appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.