Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
Davis v. Washington
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In Davis v. Washington, a 911 operator answered a call from Michelle McCottrey, who was in the midst of a physical fight with her boyfriend, Adrian Davis (Defendant). McCottrey was frantic and in response to the 911 operator’s questions, identified Davis as the person who was beating her. Davis was charged with felony violation of a domestic no-contact order. At trial, the recording of the 911 call was admitted into evidence, over Davis’s objections. The jury convicted Davis, and he appealed. The lower appellate court and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed. In Hammon v. Indiana, police responded to a report of a domestic disturbance at the home of Amy and Hershel Hammon (Defendant). Amy Hammon greeted them, looking frightened but denying that anything was the matter. She gave them permission to enter the house, whereupon the police saw a broken furnace. One of the police officers remained with Hershel Hammon while the other officer questioned Amy Hammon in the living room. In response to the officer’s questions, Amy Hammon wrote a statement that admitted that Hammon had broken the furnace, shoved her down into the broken glass, hit her, and threw her down. Hammon was charged with domestic battery and violating his probation. Amy Hammon did not appear at trial. The prosecution called the officer who had spoken with Amy Hammon to testify as to what she had said to him and to authenticate her affidavit. Hammon was convicted, and the conviction was affirmed by the lower appellate court and the Indiana Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in both cases.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.