Contracts Keyed to Murray
Chaplin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
The Epilepsy Foundation of America and Phyllis Chaplin (Plaintiffs) sued Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Defendant) for a violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701. Defendant provided a settlement agreement to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs notified Defendant that they had objections to the proposed settlement. Defendant provided another letter to Plaintiffs, stating that it was willing to finalize the previously offered settlement agreement, but that if the settlement agreement was not accepted as proposed, Defendant would withdraw all offers to settle. Plaintiffs sent a letter to Defendant stating that they did not accept the offered settlement agreement. Plaintiffs later had a change of heart and sent a second letter to Defendant, stating that they accepted the offer of settlement. Plaintiffs then moved the court to enjoin Defendant to execute the settlement agreement, arguing that their second letter constituted a binding acceptance, creating a contract between Plaintiffs and Defendant to settle the case.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.