Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to George
Centech Group, Inc. v. Getronicswang Co.
Facts
After Centech Group, Inc. (Centech) (offended party) entered into a contract with the U.S. Naval force (the Navy) to convert over 55 million microfiche staff records into digital format, it sub-contracted a segment of the work to I-NET to outline and build up a data conversion system. I-NET in this manner moved toward becoming Getronicswang Company (litigant). Centech neglected to perform as indicated by the terms of the prime contract with the Navy. Centech entered into an understanding with I-NET (Original MOU) with which gave that I-NET would expect risk from Centech for execution of the Navy by either (1) a novation of the sub-contract or (2) a rebuilding of the sub-contract. On the off chance that the parties were not able to accomplish both of the above, they consented to work in accordance with some basic honesty to rebuild the Navy consent to permit I-NET to end up noticeably fundamentally in charge of the expectations. Also, I-NET consented to grant over $9 million in sub-contracts to Centech over a time of years. After the parties were not able to consent to a novation or a generous rebuilding, they went into another MOU (Revised MOU) which explicitly superseded every past understanding and required I-NET to recognize and seek after $10 million worth of venture open doors for Centech. After I-NET neglected to furnish Centech with the required contracting and venture openings, Centech recorded suit in federal district court against I-NET for breach of the agreement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of I-NET. Centech appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.