Contracts Keyed to Calamari
Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The Plaintiff, John Salsbury (the "Plaintiff"), played a role in establishing Charles City College (the "College"). In order to raise money for the college, the College retained a professional fund raiser, Peter Bruno ("Mr. Bruno"). The professional fund raiser solicited a subscription, from the Defendant, Bell Telephone Company (the "Defendant"). The Defendant's office manager in Charles City was Daryl V. Winder ("Mr. Winder"). Mr. Winder was also involved in raising money for the College. However, Mr. Winder could not bind the Defendant on his own, so he asked his superiors if they were willing to make a contribution. The Defendant eventually consented to a subscription, but Mr. Winder did not fill out a pledge form when he received the Defendant's consent. Instead, Mr. Winder wrote a letter to Mr. Bruno informing him of the Defendant's willingness to make a $15,000 contribution over a three-year period. The first $5,000 payment was to be made in 1986.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.