Contracts Keyed to Calamari
Hadley v. Baxendale
ProfessorMelissa A. Hale
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The Plaintiff in this case was a miller. On May 11, Plaintiff’s mill stopped due to a broken crank shaft. On May 12, Plaintiff found that the shaft had been fractured. The mill did not possess any other crank shafts; therefore, it was necessary to obtain a new one so that the mill could resume work. In order to obtain a new shaft, Plaintiff had to send the broken shaft to the manufacturer in Greenwich so that it could be used as a model for a new shaft. On May 13, Plaintiff’s servant went to a well-known carrier to inquire about shipping the shaft to Greenwich. The servant requested that the broken shaft be sent immediately because the mill was stopped. The carrier informed the servant that if they received the crank shaft before noon, it could deliver it to Greenwich the following day. The servant brought the crank shaft to the carrier before noon and paid for the shipment. However, the delivery was delayed due to the carrier’s neglect. This delay caused the Plaintiff to lose profits because it did not receive a new crank shaft for several days and could not resume work until it received the new shaft. Plaintiff then sued for lost profits.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
9m 25s