Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Varat
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Facts
The Arizona Legislature passed the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Act (the Act), a law that allowed candidates running for state office who accepted public financing to receive additional money from the State when a privately-funded opponent and independent expenditure groups (groups) spent money. Once a publicly-financed candidate spent a certain amount, he thereafter received roughly one dollar for every dollar spent by an opposing privately-funded candidate or group under the law’s “matching funds provision.” The Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC, several candidates running for state office, and others (collectively Plaintiffs) challenged the constitutionality of the law and claimed that it infringed their right to free speech under the First Amendment. Plaintiffs brought suit in district court against Ken Bennett, Arizona’s Secretary of State and others (collectively Defendants). The district court issued an injunction against implementation of the law and held that the Act substantially burdened the free speech rights of privately-funded candidates and groups without a compelling state interest. The court of appeals reversed and held that the matching funds provision imposed only a minimal burden on First Amendment rights in furtherance of a compelling state interest, namely to reduce political corruption. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.