Constitutional Law Keyed to Rotunda
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
The Price-Anderson Act of 1957 established limits to the liability which operators of nuclear power plants would face in the event of a nuclear accident. After the Act was renewed in 1975, Duke Power Company (Defendant) began to construct two new nuclear power plants in North Carolina and South Carolina. Carolina Environmental Study Group (Plaintiff), along with a labor union and 40 individuals who lived near the sites of the new power plants, filed suit in federal court against Plaintiffs and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to challenge the constitutionality of the Price-Anderson Act. The district court found that Plaintiffs had standing and concluded that the Act was unconstitutional. Plaintiffs petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.