Conflicts Keyed to Currie
Shaffer v. Heitner
ProfessorBrittany L. Raposa
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Facts
Heitner (Plaintiff) owned one share of Greyhound (Defendant) stock. Defendant had been subjected to a large antitrust judgment in Oregon. Heitner (Plaintiff), a nonresident of Delaware, brought a derivative suit in Delaware, the state of Defendant’s incorporation. Jurisdiction was based on sequestration of Defendant stock, which was deemed to be located within the state of incorporation. The Delaware sequestration statute allowed property within the state to be seized ex parte to compel the owner to submit to the in personam jurisdiction of the court. None of the stock was actually in Delaware, but a freeze order was placed on the corporate books. Defendant made a special appearance to challenge the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter. Defendant argued that the sequestration statute was unconstitutional under the line of cases beginning with Sniadach, 395 U.S. 337 (1969). Defendant also argued that there were insufficient contacts with Delaware to justify an exercise of jurisdiction. The Delaware courts found that the sequestration statute was valid as it was not a per se seizure of the property and was only invoked to compel out-of-state residents to defend actions within the state. Little, if any, consideration was given to the “contact” argument based on a finding that the presence of stock within the state conferred quasi in rem jurisdiction.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
18m 35s