Confirm favorite deletion?
Conflicts Keyed to Currie
English v. General Electric Co.
Facts
Vera English (Plaintiff) was a laboratory technician at a nuclear plant managed by General Electric Company (GE) (Defendant). She brought a complaint to the management of GE (Defendant) and to the federal government regarding her co-workers failure to clean up radioactive spills in the laboratory. In response to Defendant’s failure to address the issue, Plaintiff intentionally did not clean a work area contaminated with uranium during an earlier shift. She outlined the contaminated areas with red tape to make the spills obvious. A few days passed, and she called her supervisor’s attention to the fact that the areas still had not been cleaned. Defendant stopped work in order to inspect and clean the laboratory, and then charged Plaintiff with a knowing failure to clean up radioactive contamination. Plaintiff was reassigned and eventually fired. She filed a complaint with the Labor Department, charging Defendant with violation of § 210(a) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, which makes it unlawful for a nuclear industry employer to retaliate against an employee for reporting safety violations. An administrative law judge found a § 210(a) violation, but the Labor Department dismissed the complaint as untimely. Plaintiff then filed a diversity action in district court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant, raising a state-law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, among other things. The court dismissed the claim on the ground that it conflicted with three aspects of § 210 and was therefore preempted. The court of appeals affirmed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.