Conflicts Keyed to Currie
In re Schneider’s Estate
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Schneider was born in Switzerland but had become a naturalized American citizen of the United States. He was domiciled in New York and died there. He left a will disposing of all of his assets. A portion of his assets disposed of by the will consisted of real property located in Switzerland, which he kept ownership of following his move to the United States. Internal Swiss law specified that certain portions of a decedent’s property must descend to his legitimate heirs and that any testamentary disposition contrary to this law was void. The will was probated in New York. At the time of probate, the administratrix of the estate had liquidated the real property in Switzerland and had brought the resulting funds into New York. A claim was filed against the estate by the decedent’s heirs in Switzerland claiming the right to the proceeds as determined by Swiss law. The testamentary disposition was valid under New York law.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.