Confirm favorite deletion?
Commercial Law Keyed to Lopucki
Security First Network Bank v. C.A.P.S., Inc
Facts
Joseph V. Sykes (Sykes), using the name “Marvin Goldman” opened an account with Security First Network Bank. Sykes then fraudulently initiated a debit entry to transfer funds from Saks, Incorporated’s account with LaSalle Bank National Association. Sykes initiated two debit transfers in the amount of $450,000 each from Saks Inc.’s account to his account with Security First Network Bank as Marvin Goldman. The debit transfers were originated through Security First Network Bank using Saks, Inc.’s account number but wrongfully naming the account holder as “Marvin Goldman.” Sykes also fraudulently initiated a debit entry to transfer funds from Consolidated Artist’s Payroll Service, Inc.’s account with The Northern Trust Company to Syke’s account with Security First Network Bank as Marvin Goldman. Sykes originated three debit transfers in the amount of $175,000 each in the same manner as above. Neither Consolidated Artist’s Payroll Service, Inc. nor Saks, Inc. authorized the debit transfers. They assert that when Security First Network Bank discovered Sykes’ fraudulent scheme it failed to timely notify LaSalle Bank National Association and The Northern Trust Company. Security First Network Bank refused the banks’ demands it return the money. Saks brought suit against Security First Network Bank alleging negligence and breach of warranties under the 2000 NACHA Operating Rules and the U.C.C. Consolidated Artist’s Payroll Service, Inc. brought suit for breach of Security First Network Bank’s duty to exercise ordinary care under the U.C.C., breach of warranties under the U.C.C. and for violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.