Civil Procedure Keyed to Yeazell
Chiquita International Ltd. v. M/V Bolero Reefer
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Plaintiff sued Defendant for cargo loss and damage onboard the M/V Bolero Reefer, owned by Defendant. Plaintiff alleged that Defendant was engaged to transport bananas from Ecuador to Germany. Due to alleged malfunctions of the vessel’s loading cranes, 43,000 boxes of bananas due to be shipped, were left on the wharf. Defendant submitted a letter in support of an application to compel discovery of Winer, a marine surveyor who examined the vessel and loading gear at Plaintiff’s request shortly after the vessel arrived in Germany. Defendant sought Winer’s deposition and production of the file he assembled in connection with his inspection. Plaintiff objected to those demands on the grounds that Winer was a non-testifying expert, as to whom discovery is closely circumscribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(b)(4)(B). Defendant replied that Winer is a fact witness rather than an expert.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.