Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Hazard
United States v. Kubrick
Facts
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) permits an individual to sue a federal agency in court as long as certain requirements are met. Among these statutory prerequisites are certain statutes of limitations, including a two-year statute regarding medical malpractice claims. In 1968, Kubrick (Plaintiff) underwent surgery in a Veteran’s Administration (VA) hospital (Defendant) for an infection in his right femur. Part of the treatment involved the administration of the antibiotic neomycin. Shortly after surgery, Plaintiff noticed a ringing sensation in his ear coupled with loss of hearing. In January of 1969, an ear specialist diagnosed Plaintiff with bilateral nerve deafness and indicated that condition might have been caused by his neomycin treatment. Plaintiff went on to make multiple requests for adjustments to his VA pension, all of which were denied. In 1971, and while appealing the VA’s denial of benefit adjustment, Plaintiff became aware that his original ear doctor believed that the neomycin should never have been administered to Plaintiff in the first place. This prompted Plaintiff to sue for medical malpractice. The government argued that the claim had accrued in 1969, when Plaintiff became aware of the condition and its cause. Plaintiff argued that the statute of limitations should begin tolling in 1971, when he was made aware of the legal implications of the treatment. The district court ruled for Plaintiff. The government appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed. The government appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.