Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Crump
McLaughlin v. Fellows Gear Shaper Co
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
After the plaintiff’s thumb was cut off while using a machine manufactured by the defendant, the plaintiff sued, arguing the machine was defective because it should have had an automatic shut off button. The defendant argued that because the plaintiff was standing on top of the machine when injured, they could not foresee the accident. The trial court submitted interrogatories to the jury asking (1) if the machine was defective, (2) if the machine was defective, was the defect proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury, (3) was it was foreseeable to the defendant that an operator of the machine might stand on top of it, (4) did the plaintiff assume the risk of injury, and (5) what damages should be awarded if the judge ruled in the plaintiff’s favor. The jury answered in the affirmative to questions (1), (2), and (4), and in the negative to question (3). The jury awarded the plaintiffs $120,000. The judge then asked the jury was the plaintiff standing on top of the machine a substantial factor in him getting hurt and was it the only cause of the injury, which the jury responded no, and they were going to find for the plaintiff. The judge set aside the verdict of the jury.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.